The PS3`s Halo it wont be, no matter how hard they attempt it, R: FOM Wasnt the best game I ever played but it wasn’t bad either although there really wasn’t anything to play at the time, I expect nothing more for the sequel. In regards to religious implications, it would make them very silly if they did included places of worship that you can go and shoot up!, why not offend politically with it being set in the US, how about we get to Shoot up the Pentagon or The White House, After all Mr. Bush protects the rights for `Gun Nuts` everywhere to own guns, would that right be protected in a WWII with aliens?.
Since Sony said Killzone 1 before being launched would be a HALO beater...Biggest joke ever imo.
I know there are those that hate HALO and those that love it like me, the thing with HALO 1 was it just had something unique about how it was and will always be the best shooter of all time imo.
Yeah, and one of the other main differenced being, people* actually played Halo.
Halo also had actual graphics and sound, and actual controls, and actual System Link gameplay.
Which allowed actual multiplayer games, not the "hope the guy I'm trying to snipe/ambush doesn't look at my postage stamp-sized, even lower res section of the screen before I shoot/melee him" crap you end up with in splitscreen multiplayer.
And not to go on about the vehicles, but the Warthog and the Scorpion were special in that they were multi-seat vehicles. Thats just awesome in multiplayer. Obviously there are some more in Halo3...
Yeah, and one of the other main differenced being, people* actually played Halo.
Halo also had actual graphics and sound, and actual controls, and actual System Link gameplay.
Which allowed actual multiplayer games, not the "hope the guy I'm trying to snipe/ambush doesn't look at my postage stamp-sized, even lower res section of the screen before I shoot/melee him" crap you end up with in splitscreen multiplayer.
And not to go on about the vehicles, but the Warthog and the Scorpion were special in that they were multi-seat vehicles. Thats just awesome in multiplayer. Obviously there are some more in Halo3...
*by which I mean a lot** of people
:)
Goldeneye sold over ten million copies and was in the top-5 games sold of its generation, the other four being Super Mario 64, Legend of Zelda: OoT, Super Mario Kart 64 (i know, top-5? what the hell?) and FF7.
Offcourse it should have had those things! You know how many FPS-games before it actually had vehicles! (including Goldeneye) and good controls and good AI (Half-Life, some of my friends actually think Half-Life still has the best AI in a FPS, relucantant i have to agree). It's called evolution thanks to (new) technology used in new ways! Like how now dual-analog has become absolute thanks to the Wiimote. There's nothing wrong wit that. Sometimes you have to explain everything...:p
Just too bad Halo never had the same degree of love in it as Goldeneye, I mean, in Goldeneye you have a death animation of like a minute long with a guy slowly going down grabbing his own neck like his choking in his own blood and the twithing on the floor. I could just felt the developer love right then, gives you a warm feeling. Or the sneezing animation of the guards(and other idle animations of guards), or how they actually animated the guards balancing their gun on their arm so they can unpin a grenade, after he took the pin out I shot him and boom! Good times, good times.
Some like Halo some hate Halo then there are some that think Halo is the best FPS ever like me...Everyone has their own opinion and even though I never played Goldeneye I am not going to go slag it off.
Some like Halo some hate Halo then there are some that think Halo is the best FPS ever like me...Everyone has their own opinion and even though I never played Goldeneye I am not going to go slag it off.
SuperSaiyan4 wrote:
Some like Halo some hate Halo then there are some that think Halo is the best FPS ever like me...Everyone has their own opinion and even though I never played Goldeneye I am not going to go slag it off.
Never Usually stops you SS………. Sorry couldn’t resist.
I think the draw to Goldeneye, Is down to a number of factors that were never seen in a console FPS before
1) Cinematic style of the game (a sense of actually being there) or actually seeing the movie scenes/locations and recognizing them. 2) First time a complete and usable control scheme for a console was available to a FPS 3) 4 Player Death Match! Truly made this game 4) Attention to detail (as already pointed out)
But these very simple things that made it great and landmark title back then are now nostalgic and normal/expected in every FPS since, so Goldeneye by today’s standards would of suck, big time.
I think the draw to Goldeneye, Is down to a number of factors that were never seen in a console FPS before
1) Cinematic style of the game (a sense of actually being there) or actually seeing the movie scenes/locations and recognizing them. 2) First time a complete and usable control scheme for a console was available to a FPS 3) 4 Player Death Match! Truly made this game 4) Attention to detail (as already pointed out)
But these very simple things that made it great and landmark title back then are now nostalgic and normal/expected in every FPS since, so Goldeneye by today’s standards would of suck, big time.
OK let me address these in order.
1) Don't make me laugh, the graphics looked horrid even then, not cinematic in any sense of the term, aside from the root IP being a movie. 2) It was neither complete, nor in my opinion useable. 3) Halo's 4-player System Link trumps this. If you can say that GoldenEye is truly made by the feeble splitscreen, then Halo is not only its rightful successor, but its Lord and Master. I could comment on the 16-player capability but splitscreen gaming is counter to my religious beliefs. 4) I certainly didn't find a lack of attention to detail in Halo.
In any event, Halo is better than GoldenEye for the sole reason that you don't have to use "the worst console accessory of all time" to play Halo. Also, you can jump and aim while running...
2320 comments
In regards to religious implications, it would make them very silly if they did included places of worship that you can go and shoot up!, why not offend politically with it being set in the US, how about we get to Shoot up the Pentagon or The White House, After all Mr. Bush protects the rights for `Gun Nuts` everywhere to own guns, would that right be protected in a WWII with aliens?.